[Michael Leavitt's Home Page | Back Issues of the MMM | Current Issue of the MMM]
|
Michael Leavitt & Co Inspections, Inc. |
|
MONDAY MORNING MESSENGER |
|
Message prepared especially for Members of the American Institute of Inspectors® as well as Home Inspectors abroad |
GOOOOOD MORNING, A.I.I.....
It's a great day here in Orem, Utah! The Olympics are now in full swing and by the next issue of the MMM they will be all over. Our weather has been great and our Olympic visitors have been having a great time. Our inspection market has been so so and it is unknown what the long term effects of the gold metal events will bring. The local economy can't wait for them to be over so that things can get back to normal. Later this week the Leavitt's will be hitting downtown Salt Lake City to take advantage of the Olympic environment. Haily wants to be a figure skater. Jessica idolizes Peek-a-boo Street. Adam Loves the bionic air half pipe snowboarders. And little Aaron loves anything that will get him airborn....... Watch out SLC!
This past week brought some happy news to the family of our current AII President Jim Corbin. Jim is now a Grandpa and I have never seen him look happier.
Among my many events of the past few weeks...computers, flu, cold, inspections...I became the proud Grandpa of my first granddaughter. Permit me to introduce Samantha Marie Klotter, born 1/22/02 at 3:55 pm. She weighed in at 6# - .08 oz. and was 20 inches in length. Mom did a great job and is doing well. Although small, Samantha is healthy in all respects and all of the plumbing works! She is...unbiased opinion, of course...a most beautiful baby girl and definitely has Grandpa around her little finger. It is a great event to hold a new granddaughter. Looking across the room and seeing ones daughter and now this wonderful bundle. In this picture, Samantha is but 2.5 hours old. Birthing these days is a great deal different than when my two were born some 33 years ago. One has immediate access to mom and baby following the birth and in a room that is like home, instead of a hospital. Visiting them now is such a treat. Holding, feeding, changing is not a job but a privilege now. My job now is to spoil her and then give her back to mom and dad! Just thought I'd share my life event with you all. Have a good day! Jim Corbin - Bow, WA
The American Institute of Inspectorspresents the2002 Spring ConferenceWHEN: April 5-7, 2002 WHERE: Circus-Circus, 500 North Sierra St., Reno, NV 89503 ACCOMMODATIONS: With twin towers dominating the skyline, Circus Circus is conveniently located a short drive from the Virginia Street exit off interstate 80 in the heart of downtown Reno. Located only three miles from the Reno-Tahoe International Airport with a free airport shuttle service. Free self-parking in two garages as well as valet parking service. Check it out www.circusreno.com . Featuring a newly opened and the most modern meeting and banquet space available. Almost 20,000 square feet of space with cutting edge audio-visual equipment and separate from all casino activity. (hooray!) Over 1500 beautifully remolded rooms and suites. For reservations: 1-866-447-7728. Identify yourself as a participant of the American Institute of Inspectors' Spring Conference to receive discounted rates. Main tower $89.00 per night + tax, Sky tower $69.00 per night + tax. This rate is guaranteed until March 15th.There is a tram traveling between the main building and the sky tower regularly. Jacuzzi suites also available. There are also several other hotel choices in the immediate downtown area if you want to shop around for a better rate. I have tried to cover all bases from the feedback you've given me. Free daily world-class circus acts and a popular Midway of Carnival Games. Connected to the Silver Legacy and Eldorado by a second floor skywalk , comprising the Tri-Property complex to make up 4,100 rooms and 22 restaurants. Six great restaurants to choose from inside Circus Circus.
Continuing Education Credit as follows:
Registration Fees:
Register by Phone or Fax using your credit card, or mail check or Credit Card information to:
|
After understandably growing tired of my constant remarks bout FHA Inspections, Michael has asked me to take some space here in the MMM to share with you some of my knowledge that I have gleaned pertaining to inspections for FHA loans. Let me say from the start that I am aware that there are many of you out there that have a better knowledge of FHA requirements than I do. I am not a self-styled expert. I do perform a lot of FHA inspections. I also do my fair share of USDA Rural Development Loan inspections. For some reason, possibly the area economy, there are quite a few homes purchased with FHA loans in my area.
About four years ago, wanting to do the best job of inspecting that I could, and realizing that I didn't know zip about FHA requirements, I started doing some research. It took a lot of phone calls, letters, and surfing the web to build the database that I have now. Many of you already have knowledge of the things that I am going to cover so this will be a good refresher. Some of you have a greater knowledge so please bear with me. On the other hand, some of you may be new to home inspecting and especially FHA inspections. Some of you will be surprised at the things that I will tell you. Some of you will contest me. That is what this forum is here for.
What I have in mind is to share several topics and your responses will be welcome. I will do my best to be able to back up what I say with the proper references and hold conjecture to a minimum. I will urge you to do the same. In the end, after we have all discussed this and given our different inputs, perhaps we will come out of this each of us being a better inspector.
I will be referring to the HUD Handbook 4150.2 "Valuation Analysis for Home Mortgage Insurance for Single Family One-to Four Unit Dwellings". I urge you, if you do not have a copy of this manual, and you intend to do FHA inspections, then you can get a copy by downloading from: http://www.hudclips.org or from http://hud.gov/reac/reasfappr or you can call 1-800-767-7468 and order a copy. This handbook, among other things, gives the appraiser his/her criteria for conducting an FHA appraisal. We will cover the use of this manual a little later. I will be discussing regular FHA Home Mortgage Insurance Inspections, but I will not touch upon FHA 203K inspections, as that program is entirely different.
First a brief word about the Federal Home Administration. The FHA is part of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (HUD). FHA was formed way back when in order to provide a way for hard working people to be able to buy a home. People that were reliable, but would probably never have the cash to buy that home, but were creditworthy were the target for the FHA programs. In reality, the FHA only guarantees the loan to the institution that is granting the loan to the homebuyer. The actual lender may be a bank, savings and loan association, Mortgage Company, credit union or other FHA approved lender. The FHA promises to pay the lender if the borrower defaults on the mortgage.
The FHA Loan network is administered by a private contractor. For the West Coast, they are based in Santa Anna California. If you are fortunate enough to get through the phone receptionist, and the extension maze, the person you want to talk to may be either away from their desk, or they can't even spell inspection. Forget them! Write them off. There are what I suppose Regional FHA hub offices. Mine is in Portland. If you have to call them, you will first have to get past the receptionist who will be trying to divert you back to the Santa Anna office. Be firm and do not give up hope. There are people sitting back there who will help you if you can get through to them. Hopefully, after these MMM articles, you won't even have a need to call them.
Naturally, the government being what it is, a whole gigantic bureaucracy has developed through the years that administrates this agency. They have written dozens of manuals and hundreds of Mortgagee Letters that governed and directed the dissemination of your tax dollars. Manuals were written, and immediately they were revised and added to by Mortagee Letters. Mortgagee Letters are used to issue additional information or revisions to manuals and other Mortgagee letters. Hey! I'm retired federal. I know how it is. You have to have something for these guys to do. Finally they decided to update and consolidate all of this, and on May 20, 1999, they came out with HUD Handbook 4150.2 REV-1.
Immediately after 4150.2 was finished, Mortgagee Letters ware being written to revise it. In January of this year the Portland FHA office verbally confirmed that this still is the manual in use. We will cover more on this later. The purpose of this manual is in no way directed towards providing guidance for the home inspector. Its purpose is to cover the registration and credentials of the appraiser, set the acceptable standards for the property, and to guide the appraiser in making his appraisal. It however, does provide us with a great deal of guidance. If you are familiar with the requirements prior to 4150.2, you will note that these revised requirements have been greatly "watered down." We will cover these items more a little later. You will find that except for a couple of things, any good comprehensive inspection report such as the 3D, will pretty well cover all of the requirements for an FHA guaranteed loan.
Although FHA does not require a home inspection, they strongly recommend one being made. Each lender is required to give the prospective buyer a copy of "For Your Protection: Get a Home Inspection." The client is supposed to sign the form to indicate that they understand the importance of getting a home inspection.
There are no official forms that I am aware of that can be used for an FHA inspection. If someone knows of any please send me a copy. I use a self-made form in addition to my regular inspection form that I fill out as I go. I usually just hand it to the client during the walk-through after the inspection. It just generally covers some of the requirements peculiar to FHA. I use it is mostly to indicate to the client that I have directed my inspection towards FHA requirements.
Some Inspectors have the understanding that the FHA requirements are some great additional burden looming over them that will add greatly to their workload. I have not found that to be true. When 4150.2 came out, the appraisers immediately said that they would have to raise their fees. Why? Because now they were going to have to climb up into attics, and crawl under houses. So? I thought that they were supposed to do that any way. They already charge for that. I am not against increasing fees at any opportunity, but I can't see that FHA should add to your workload all that much. On this point is where some of you will contest me and I look forward to your replies.
So let us consider how Handbook 4150.2 affects our inspections and us. The appraiser has the duty of looking at the candidate property and determining if it qualifies by meeting the standards set in that manual. That is not the home inspector's responsibility. The home inspector generally looks at that home before the appraiser gets there. The home inspector should look at the home using his/her inspection standard report to make sure any damage, discrepancies, etc are noted. At the same time he /she should be aware of the FHA requirements. Any items noted would then be brought to the attention of the client. It is the client's responsibility to give the seller or the seller's agent fair warning that work will have to be done to repair, replace or be added on in order for the home to qualify for FHA. Since the appraiser is going to be using the standards in 4150.2, then it stands to reason that the inspector is going to have to use the standards in 4150.2. Is that going to take a lot of additional work? We will see:
TED'S 4150.2 DISCLAIMER - The Handbook 4150.2 was written with the idea in mind of making it a simple as the writer could make it. The writer failed miserably. It is so simplified that it is fragmented. In order to gain any wisdom from this book, you have to search through the whole thing and assemble you findings together so that you can use them. Those of you who already have a copy know what I mean. Those of you who don't will need to get a copy. Without getting too far into it, believe me, it is a mess. However, if you stay with it, you will get an eventually put it together. Immediately after the manual came out, it came under fire, and is already being revised.
The inspection form that the appraiser will be using is the HUD Form HUD-92564-VC, which is commonly referred to as the "VC" form. A copy of this form for your files would be a handy addition. There are a lot of things that the appraiser will be looking for that do not concern you as a home inspector: Location of the property, flood plane, proximity to oil wells, power lines etc. The appraisal is not a home inspection. In most cases I have found that the appraiser loves to get his hands on a home inspector's report before the appraisal. If you just confine your inspection to your regular routine, keeping in mind these little extras, you hardly notice the difference.
I think that I have shared enough preface and think that we should start the discussion. For next week's MMM I would like to hit the topic of Underground Storage Tanks. I would appreciate your information about UST's and whether or not they are a big deal and whether or not we are charged with looking for them.
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS: If I happen to find the signs of a buried fuel tank, or if someone gives me a heads-up I will look for the tank, and finding evidence, I will note it on my report. DEQ is not concerned about them, unless they are leaking. There is no directive from the State that tells me that I have to look for, or report buried fuel tanks. It is not a requirement in the AII SOP. Of course we don't want our client buying an undisclosed fuel tank especially if it is leaking. The VC Form simply says: "Surface evidence of Underground Storage Tanks (UST) Yes or No. If you have HUD 4150.2, look at page D-25 for the protocol on this.
Hi everyone it's Scott DeWitz, the "Most Qualified Inspector in Town" and my fees reflect it. Do yours???????? I think that we should be State licensed to include the most difficult test known to man. This would give the perception that we are qualified and worth the fees that we all should be "charging." Perceived Value is what it's all about. I agree that state licensing will not make us better inspectors, my point is the money. We should be making 3 times what we do for the value that we bring to the transaction. I also believe that State licensing with a hard test might get rid of many of the part time or uneducated so called inspectors that reflect poorly on our collective image. I work for money and I want to make more to take care of my family pay for my children's education and hopefully retire someday, not in a trailer.
Everyone in the Real Estate industry is well compensated for the service that they provide to the industry. A home inspector has to have more knowledge and education than anyone else involved why are we not fairly compensated. I was the first to set my fees to be the same as an appraisal , that was a huge leap in our area. Russ and I started UPREI we again raised fees and have always taken the lead, and trying to drag the rest of our local inspectors along is like pulling a ball and chain. I wish that our industry had some more %%#^^&^&^%. We are swamped and higher fees have helped us not hurt us (Perceived Value). If our industry as a whole would wake up and start "charging" what they are worth I suppose I would be opposed to State Licensing but as I see it now it's our only hope of getting the credibility we deserve. Maybe, sadly, that's what it will take for many inspectors to feel justified in raising their fees. Even though most of you got no guts I still love you A.I.I. members Scott DeWitz
Wow Scott, you really got on your soap box this time. Hey, if you paid your dues you could join the chat line on your own computer. You scare me with this bureaucratic money making talk about licensing. What gives Bubba? Jim Lucas, Camino, Ca
Scott, I see your point. CPA's- licensed to practice math $100-$400 per hour, Lawyers- licensed to practice law $160-$$$$ per hour, Doctors licensed to practice medicine-$$$-$$$ and so on.... Is this what it will take (licensing) to get the market to recognize our collective worth. Remember my goal is our fee at 1% of the selling price.
CA bill was introduced- Alright fellow HI's in CA now it is time to start writing letters to the representatives directly about our concerns. You need to make your concerns known point by point. It appears that the majority of CCHI is unwilling, due to their personal agendas, to represent our concerns. Our representatives are speaking out and should be lauded for their effort, but being shunned. The make-up of CCHI appears to be lopsided with the majority coming from the only CA association with over 200 members, one rep. does not even reside in CA and has not for the past two years, but carries a strong voice with CCHI.
AII should immediately embark on a recruiting campaign in CA to increase its membership. I have already talked to many non-AII inspectors to get them to join by explaining the benefits (some were not members of any association and did not have a clue as to what was going on). Others I talked with about the CA bill belong to associations but also did not know what was being attempted-lack of communication to it's members. If each of us would seriously attempt to recruit we can increase our numbers dramatically. Our association offers the best training, a unlimited source of information 24-7 (hotline), the Monday Morning Messenger, lower dues, national representation, strict guidelines, and the camaraderie of its membership. John Rebenstorff - Orangevale CA
John, I applaud your convictions and agree with much of what you say. I believe it is to early to begin lobbying the legislators individually. CCHI has accomplished much in the past years due to it's ability to represent the inspection industry at the capitol with a single united voice. Let me assure you there is much dissent amongst the members of the steering committee and a significant discussion is going on. I truly believe the majority of the members on this committee have the industry’s best interest at heart, not their selves or their individual associations. The out of state inspector you speak of represents ITA to the committee and is also the current president of ASHI. I personally hold him in the highest regard and do not believe for a minute that he has any untoward intentions. I have known him for many years. A.I.I. is not being shunned. It is to early to begin to speak of breaking down a coalition that has done much to the benefit of the home inspection industry in California. A little patience and faith please. I will keep all informed of progress. Jon Gudnason - CCHI Representative
Let's see now--I used my drivers license to get to my inspection this morning. In order to have a business in Sacramento I have a business license. With my C36 and B State Contractors Licenses I have been able to gain enough information and knowledge to make a decent living as a house inspector. My wife's retired, our kids are raised and don't ask for money (they bought there own cars, insurance, so I had no expenses there), so our need for a big income may not be as high as yours. Quityurbitchin about not making enough money , and spend more time making money. And if you don't like what you're doing, quit doing it. My fees are based on "perceived value" too. I give my clients more than they ever ask for--that's the value. And I have fun doing it !!! And I used my own computer to write this !!! I wish you all the most prosperity you deserve. I am prosperous. Robert Fischbach.
To Scott DeWitz: Sorry, you're wrong about licensing increasing fees. JUST THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE.
Talk with any members of the Texas state association in 1990. TAREI members made the same exact argument you have made about fees when I met with them in 1991 before Texas went to state licensing.
It turns out that the RE industry controls their business, has inserted into state law in years that followed a "standard home inspection form" that every HI must use, and fees have dropped dramatically from what they were 10 years ago.
Here's the truth about licensing -- The state cannot create a tough enough test to eliminate lousy competitors. If that were true, there would be no lousy contractors, lawyers, doctors, or barbers.
ALL THAT HAPPENS with licensing is that:
![]() |
Looks like an device that you could fill with gasoline and create a great fast spreading fire when the light bulb is activated. (AKA Arson) Roger Ball -Toledo Ohio
Bob, you make me homesick. You probably report on hese old porcelain fxtures but if not I have a macro in my report that says: Improve: Very old style porcelain light fixtures, used without electrical boxes, are not safe and should be replaced. Live electrical connections are exposed on these fixtures. Chris Burkhart - Sandy, Ut
Most of the readership of the MMM is unaware of the state of affairs here in Utah. Being situated in the wild west and being on the small remaining list of states without home inspector licensing, our profession is still in its infancy. There are probably 50 to 80 inspectors scattered throughout the state. Association memberships are varied with most inspectors not being affiliated with any trade associations at all. I was involved as a founding member in a group of inspectors three years ago that had a good goal of being mainly non-denominational. All inspectors were welcomed at that time. As with all righteous endeavors it is the nature of men that gain a little power to spoil the original intent for their own gain. Our original chapter president is and was an ASHI member and he arranged to get the chapter backed by ASHI even though there were only 4 ASHI members in the state at that time.
You can probably guess where this story is heading. The 4 ASHI members has grown to 8 and the non-denominational all inclusive chapter has now been turned into an ASHI love 'em or leave 'em chapter. It has been amazing to watch the power take hold of the hearts of these members at the same time they forget the original intent and promises made during the founding meetings. As if my life is not hectic enough, I have been forced to sever my mebership from the chapter. I remained true to my original vow to the chapter and I did not proselytize or recruit for AII. I was present to support the inspection industry in Utah.
This past Wednesday night there was a formal announcement that Non-ASHI chapter member dues were tripled immediately and that the focus of the chapter was now for ASHI to dominate the local marketplace. This was a very uncomfortable atmosphere and I refused to hold my tongue. It seems that I am often in situations where current leaders forget history and they need to be reminded of how we got to this point and what decisions and promises were previously made. After the very emotional meeting at which the chapter president lost his cool I waited to see what the fallout would be. I figured that after a few days cooler heads would prevail. Then came the following e-mail titled "Open Letter To All" from the chapter president and addressed to all of the members of the chapter.
OPEN LETTER TO ALL:
To those who attended the meeting last Wednesday and to those who did not:
First off, I apologized to Dirk Burton for having to sit through part of this. When we began discussing the changes, I was under the impression that he would be later than he was. I also did not expect the discussion to take as long as it did.
As far as how the discussion went, I believe that I could have handled it better than I did. How I meant to be was certainly not how it came out. I suppose I should have given more thought on how to present the information in a more positive manner. However, decisions had just been made prior to my attempt to present this information to all. Having let a few days pass, I would like to try and add some perspective to our position and decision:
It is very important that you all understand, I respect all of you and consider you professionals. Having said that, we must look at the issues from a professional perspective.
The ASHI Chapter of Utah is an association founded and made up of individuals who have chosen ASHI for their professional designation. Its charter is to provide a local chapter where ASHI members can meet and engage in education, marketing and the promotion of ASHI. It is also charged with recruiting new individuals into the ASHI organization.
As we begin our third full year as a chapter, we have only partially met our goals. Rather we tried to provide an atmosphere that would be attractive to all inspectors with the hope they would join ASHI at some point. While some have joined, others have chosen not to. We realized that the direction we wanted to move towards, with regards to marketing, advertising, etc. would be met with resistance by the non members. The feeling being that they did not agree with spending money raised only for the benefit of the ASHI members.
While an argument can be made to this end, the money collected from non-members was considered an "education" fee. We feel that the education has been provided and therefore the fees were justified. How we chose to spend the money left over was, and rightfully so, the sole decision of the ASHI members.
Associations are a common entity in all professions. Further, to participate and benefit from associations, one must belong. If you are a real estate agent and you choose not to belong to a local board, then you do not receive the benefits the board provides. If you attend training seminars or conventions held by an association or group, of which you are not a member, you pay more.
We all make decisions regarding membership in any organization based on a "what can it do for me" question. If you fail to find benefit, you simply do not join. This is a decision we all make at different times. I know I fought joining ASHI for 6 years. I finally realized that it was vital to the growth of my business to join. Following my joining ASHI I have seen a marked increase in my business. Therefore, for me, it was the right decision. It may or may not be the right decision for you.
We hope that you choose to remain part of our group and by doing so, you will at least become a candidate member of ASHI. As our numbers continue to grow, we will become an ever more dominate force in the market place. We would love to have all of you be part of that movement. Should you choose not to, we will, regretfully, respect your decision to move in another direction. We would encourage you to form a separate group to that end.
We will continue to hold our meetings each month and will continue to provide educational speakers. The fee will be $150 for non-ASHI members and $75 for ASHI members. Beginning January of 2003 we will become an ASHI Chapter only. Nothing would make any of us happier than to see all of you be apart of this.
I would appreciate your letting me know of your intent, concerning the rest of this year, as soon as possible. Due's for everyone are due at this time.
Your responses are welcome.
Respectfully, Ted Johnson
This letter was not the letter that I was prepared to recieve at all. I hate to receive bad news. I also dislike confrontation. On the other hand I hate to be mislead and played like a fool. Secular groups are difficult to be involved in if all the participants are not honorable members. I pondered long and hard and here is my reply that was sent to all the recipients of the Open Letter To All e-mail......
Ted: I will interject my immediate emotions followed by my formal collective thoughts. I have found it better to be straight up with you rather than conceal my emotions.
TJ: To those who attended the meeting last Wednesday and to those who did not:
First off, I apologized to Dirk Burton for having to sit through part of this. When we began discussing the changes, I was under the impression that he would be later than he was. I also did not expect the discussion to take as long as it did.
ML: Why should you apologize to Dirk in this e-mail when he is not on the list of recipients of this e-mail. He got to see the chapter in action. Disputes of opinions are part of collecting a diverse group of inspectors, such as ours has been. When the discussion was ended we switched into the electrical mode and we all gleaned a great deal from our attendance. No apologies are necessary to Dirk because nothing was out of line. He gave a wonderful presentation and we were his audience for the full time span.
Your impression of how long the chapter topic would take to be discussed shows that you are completely out of touch with the feelings of those members who are Non-ASHI. When is the last time that you have discussed with me any chapter direction changes?…… I can’t think of a discussion either. You asked for my support in the past and I gave it. You said that you would tone down the conversion tactics by Mr. Solomon and I supported you. Then you turn on me and others without any thought and for this I cannot support you.
TJ: As far as how the discussion went, I believe that I could have handled it better than I did. How I meant to be was certainly not how it came out.
ML: I think that your message came through just as you meant it. You have certainly not curtailed your comments in this e-mail posting as I have read and re-read it several times in the last 24 hours. I was hoping for a complete retraction of the ASHI power play.
TJ: I suppose I should have given more thought on how to present the information in a more positive manner.
ML: Since Non-ASHI chapter members make up a huge percentage of the attendees, why not treat them as human beings and consult with the group as a whole instead of just those that have jumped through the ASHI hoops. Little regard was given to the Non-ASHI chapter members before the chapter meeting presentation or since.
TJ: However, decisions had just been made prior to my attempt to present this information to all.
ML: Once again, the only input you are taking is from ASHI candidates and members and not the faithful group as a whole. Remember those of us who have been attending for three years with few misses.
TJ: Having let a few days pass, I would like to try and add some perspective to our position and decision:
ML: Your perspective and position are apparently unchanged. You are just resharing them with careful word selection and lacking your real emotion.
TJ: It is very important that you all understand, I respect all of you and consider you professionals. Having said that, we must look at the issues from a professional perspective.
ML: I believe that what you meant to say is that you want to look at the issue from an ASHI perspective and not a professional perspective.
TJ: The ASHI Chapter of Utah is an association founded and made up of individuals who have chosen ASHI for their professional designation.
ML: Wrong. It was founded by a collection of inspectors from throughout the state. How soon we forget. Check the minutes. Check the original lest of “Founding Members” and you will see a great many Non-ASHI members on that founding member list. Check the goals established by all of the chapter members in the first two years. The goals have all of the sudden taken a massive power shift to ASHI only, when this was never the focus before.
TJ: Its charter is to provide a local chapter where ASHI members can meet and engage in education, marketing and the promotion of ASHI. It is also charged with recruiting new individuals into the ASHI organization.
ML: Those goals are imposed by ASHI national and not from with our group collectively. The chapter group goals have always varied from ASHI national because we were a unique chapter. Please don’t try to change that fact now. Please don’t try to parade around as though this has always been a traditional ASHI chapter, because it just isn’t true. Has ASHI national come down hard upon you for running a non-denominational chapter? Has the fact that you cannot market ASHI as strongly as you would like for your own business growth been nagging at you? Has the fact that the chapter hasn’t grown as quickly as other chapters around the nation put you in a less powerful position nationally got you down? If any of these questions ring true, then it is a sad day for us because we really did have a pretty good three year run of it. As with all coalitions the power destroys the group as a whole.
TJ: As we begin our third full year as a chapter, we have only partially met our goals. Rather we tried to provide an atmosphere that would be attractive to all inspectors with the hope they would join ASHI at some point.
ML: This was a sideline goal and not the major emphasis of the chapter, until now.
TJ: While some have joined, others have chosen not to. We realized that the direction we wanted to move towards, with regards to marketing, advertising, etc. would be met with resistance by the non members. The feeling being that they did not agree with spending money raised only for the benefit of the ASHI members.
ML: That’s right. There is something wrong with the mental picture of Mr. Solomon having a chapter sponsored hole at a realtor golf tournament and later trying to say that he was marketing for the chapter and not for his business alone. Was anybody else invited to be at the hole with him? Is so, it was by private invitation only. His later report of the event was a mockery as he tried to portray his time spent for the betterment of the whole and not for his own business networking.
TJ: While an argument can be made to this end, the money collected from non-members was considered an "education" fee. We feel that the education has been provided and therefore the fees were justified. How we chose to spend the money left over was, and rightfully so, the sole decision of the ASHI members.
ML: Interesting thought. I guess it was a change of thought midstream. Since we were dumb enough to allow all of the power into your hands, I guess that we have to allow the decisions to be made your way.
TJ: Associations are a common entity in all professions. Further, to participate and benefit from associations, one must belong. If you are a real estate agent and you choose not to belong to a local board, then you do not receive the benefits the board provides. If you attend training seminars or conventions held by an association or group, of which you are not a member, you pay more.
ML: You are rationalizing your actions.
TJ: We all make decisions regarding membership in any organization based on a "what can it do for me" question. If you fail to find benefit, you simply do not join. This is a decision we all make at different times. I know I fought joining ASHI for 6 years. I finally realized that it was vital to the growth of my business to join.
ML: Now come on Ted. You invested big dollars in your franchise. Your training is Amerispec training and your success comes from your efforts to follow Amerispec guidelines which have proven successful to everybody in your franchise. Your success is not a fluke. Your success is not the result of membership in one organization. Your success comes from hard word and focused attention on gaining marketshare to keep you and 3 other inspectors busy.
TJ: Following my joining ASHI I have seen a marked increase in my business. Therefore, for me, it was the right decision. It may or may not be the right decision for you.
We hope that you choose to remain part of our group and by doing so, you will at least become a candidate member of ASHI. As our numbers continue to grow, we will become an ever more dominate force in the market place. We would love to have all of you be part of that movement. Should you choose not to, we will, regretfully, respect your decision to move in another direction.
ML: Wait a minute here. Who changed the direction? Who changed the focus? Who is taking their game ball to another court?
TJ: We would encourage you to form a separate group to that end.
We will continue to hold our meetings each month and will continue to provide educational speakers. The fee will be $150 for non-ASHI members and $75 for ASHI members. Beginning January of 2003 we will become an ASHI Chapter only.
ML: Finally the small group has become big enough to kick the Non-ASHI members out of their nest.
TJ: Nothing would make any of us happier than to see all of you be apart of this.
ML: Of course, more membership gives more power to the leadership.
TJ: I would appreciate your letting me know of your intent, concerning the rest of this year, as soon as possible. Due's for everyone are due at this time.
Your responses are welcome.
Respectfully, Ted Johnson
Ted: Your recent e-mail and your disposition last Wednesday saddened me greatly. We are witnessing what a little power given to a small group can do. Power is fracturing the makeup of our group of home inspectors. Power has changed the focus of the group. And power is damaging friendships made within our little group. Then again, I guess that it had to come to this point. I believe that for the sake of ASHI you have allowed the few ASHI members to rearrange the values of our group. You have placed the gauge of success of the chapter by how many ASHI members have been converted. In other words, if you are not an ASHI candidate or member you are not welcome unless you are planning to become one. It is now an ASHI playground and you are making all of the new rules. Isn’t that a switch?
Lets reflect on history for a moment. Three years ago Kurt Solomon would have loved to start a pure ASHI chapter, but he did not have the support or the membership needed. If he had gone that route there would have been just 4 or 5 guys sitting around the table. So he took it upon himself to get a coalition of home inspectors to unite all of us in one brotherhood. Everyone was welcomed. Everybody’s opinions meant something. Oftentimes Mr. Solomon went on a recruiting binge that everybody was patient with, yet our measure of success was how many inspectors showed up to the meetings. Success was not measured by how many ASHI members were on the roster. With each recruiting effort came a drop off in attendees until the mood was toned down once again. Then our numbers would increase again. The rest of us Non-ASHI members tried to make new attendees comfortable by trying to downplay the heavy conversion tactics were being employed. Some of us even became candidates and members because of the good parts of ASHI and in spite of the local power hungry tactics being demonstrated.
It saddens me also to hear and read your attitude that it is only because of the ASHI members that this chapter has been successful. Non-ASHI members are riding your coattails to success has been the mantra of the leadership in the past year. Let’s be serious Ted, I am not successful because I am riding your coattails. My business success has little to do with this chapter. I feel like I have been played for a fool by the chapter because I have shared a lot of my business tips and woes with the membership, not realizing until now that this would end up in a bloody holy war. I certainly haven’t been out on any recruiting maneuvers for the American Institute of Inspectors and other Non-ASHI members have not been proselyting for people to join their ranks. Instead, we checked our associations at the door so that we could have an environment of learning during our chapter meetings. There are many inspectors like myself that come faithfully to the meetings and have contributed time and effort to make the chapter a success. Your success as President is partially due to their support, yet you have both drawn a line in the sand and belittled them because they have not joined ASHI. You have told them to form their own group if they do not want to join ASHI because ASHI is set to dominate the marketplace (as if it is some kind of war), and you talk to them as though their training, credentials, and membership in other associations is of little value because they are not ASHI.
Instead of a coalition of home inspectors in Utah that really would warrant on strong united voice on the political front, you now have a small group of ASHI members thinking that they represent the profession of home inspectors here in Utah. Ted, I think that you and the ASHI members have made a terrible judgment call and have taken too much power upon yourself. You cannot force a group to be united. You cannot force compliance. You cannot offend those same individuals that you are trying to convert. I believe that your judgment has been clouded with a little power and I do not think that my words here are going to change your outlook one bit. I have watched the local ASHI leadership try to represent our group without asking for any input until after their actions were taken. It scares me to know that certain ASHI leadership members are meeting both politically and with the state and local Board of Realtors getting their own views accepted as though they represent my voice too. The actions displayed have been for power and not the betterment of our profession as a whole.
Please remember Ted that you changed the focus of our group from being engaged in a work to better the profession in Utah to being a group of ASHI members who are going to dominate the inspection marketplace. This is a scary thought and you can’t have it both ways. This is a goal that I cannot stand idly by and allow to go unchecked. I cannot have the obviously power hungry individuals represent my voice when it comes to future political legislation. Your current goal of marketplace domination is one that is established on false principles and will hurt our profession more than help our profession and I cannot support it. At your insistence I am forced to publicly resign as a member of the group. What a shame!
Sincerely, Michael Leavitt - Orem, Utah
This is obviously the pump motor for a hydromassage therapy master bathroom tub. Please teach me about the bonding requirements that we should be following when evaluating these units.
![]() |
|
HAVE A GREAT WEEK! Michael Leavitt & Co Inspections, Inc. The Most Qualified Inspector in Northern Utah! |
![]() |